Sandy bridge how fast

Gadget Videos. October 19, - 0. Memiliki satu atau lebih smartphone di masa sekarang nampaknya sudah…. October 18, - 0.

Sedang mencari smartphone di rentang harga Rp 4 jutaan tetapi…. November 10, - 0. Harga Untuk saat ini kami belum mendapatkan kepastian harga untuk…. November 6, - 0. November 3, - 0. October 29, - 0. November 12, - 0. This is also the first time a non-extreme edition Intel CPU gets an unlocked multiplier. This way, you can easily overclock the CPU without having to bother with the voltages.

It will also easily handle p videos for smoother playback. The stock cooler that comes with the K does a pretty good job of keeping the CPU cool.

Unlike the puny cooler Intel used to provide in the past, this one has a copper base with three heatpipes channeling the hot air to the aluminium fins, which is then cooled by the rather groovy looking LED lit fan. You can even choose the fan modes manually between 'Performance' and 'Quiet'.

The scores seem pretty solid. Even under load the CPU temperature never went above 55 degree C, which is good considering we used the stock thermal paste that came with it and the stock cooler. During our benchmarks tests we also recorded the power consumption of our Schenker P test system.

Nevertheless, it allows to illustrate the range of the new Sandy-Bridge family. When Idle , i. It's quite different under load. Furthermore, we observed the power consumption of our test system during the wPrime benchmark , version 1.

This test allows to predefine the number of available threads. According to the figure we can conclude the following: The more threads are used the bigger the difference between QM and XM CPU in terms of energy demand. The curve of the power consumption for the QM CPU is clearly flatter and does not increase much from about 5 threads on. On the contrary, the power consumption of the Extreme CPU increases perceptibly up to eight threads, even if the curve gets flatter in the range between threads too.

Our tests prove what was to be expected according to some information leaked out in advance: Intel's new quad core Sandy Bridge CPU line up brings a huge performance gain compared to the existing Clarksfield CPUs. We saw repeatedly that the iQM processor , i. This impressively points out the success of the new CPU architecture, which largely exceeds the impact of simply higher clock rates. So, you'll get more power by buying an iQM for US-Dollar recommended price so far , which is about the same an iQM cost so far, than an iXM processor delivered, which cost steep dollar.

At the time of writing, the five quad core processors and five dual-core models are introduced. The later will be scrutinized in detail in a coming review. However, these models cost about the same or slightly more than their standard dual core counterparts.

As usual, detailed information about the new Sandy Bridge processors is available on our continuously updated Mobile Processors - Benchmark List and on the specific pages for each CPU linked there. Many thanks to Schenker-Notebook who kindly provided us with the test system. The laptop can be configured and also bought here soon. Intel once again refreshed its CPU architecture and renewed the whole processor lineup.

Read on to learn about the new features and the performance of the new processors. Intel: Tick-Tock Model. If they were on the exact same clocks and compared to each other who would win. No one can't really say coz most reviews decided to review the thing overclocked. OK correction OP if you run synthetic benchmarks all day you will get a 6 to 27 percent performance increase. In real world circumstances you get the same performance as you would now.

But if you ever had a dream to touch 5hz with overclocking then the k is your chance. Depends on the game. SB kills Nehalem in StarCraft 2.

Dec 19, 3, 0 20, That's a slight exaggeration. They're an absolutely huge improvement over the old notebook i7s, but I don't think they can quite match the desktop i7s. That's a GPU benchmark. For pure CPU tasks, they fall behind in nearly every way. The few places that they come pretty close or pull ahead a bit is due to very aggressive turbo on single threaded tasks, which is easily offset with a mild overclock on the desktop parts.

Don't get me wrong - notebook Sandy is very, very impressive, and the improvement is nothing short of monumental compared to prior generations. It just isn't quite as fast as a desktop i7. For gaming, the mobile sandys are absolutely competitive. The mobile GPUs definitely aren't though. You must log in or register to reply here. CPUs 9 Dec 16, Question Phone processors faster than desktop ones?

Post thread. News Comments.